[Libwebsockets] [PATCH 0/3] Some small fixes
amery at geeks.cl
Wed Dec 10 17:09:30 CET 2014
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:08:42AM +0800, Andy Green wrote:
> On 7 December 2014 10:36:10 GMT+08:00, Alejandro Mery <amery at geeks.cl> wrote:
> >Because of the "Subject: [PATCH]:" prefix in the subject of the
> >commits I wondered, what method do you prefer? github pull requests? or
> >git format-patch + git am?
> >Here is another dummy contribution, but using git send-email this time
> Either way is fine for me, I appreciate the contributions.
> I pushed this and your other patch about client protocol selection.
there was a force push and the fix to getifaddrs.c got lost. I don't see
the patches I sent either... because of that I sent a v2 of the client
protocol selection fix better matching your original idea.
> There's an outstanding patch modified from one that had to be reverted
> on github, I did not get a chance to look at that yet or how it will
> play with your change there. (In fact I am not sure what he's fixing
> since it's something outside of test-server / client I think).
I don't follow you :(
> Thanks for the patches.
my pleasure. Tomorrow I'll spam you again with an RFC patchset adding
context->event_ops and fixing libev support for client usage to see if
it matches what you had in mind.
More information about the Libwebsockets