[Libwebsockets] http client: seeing delayed SSL connection
joel.winarske at gmail.com
Sat Mar 4 14:40:19 CET 2017
I had time to look at this last night. I figured out my problem. Every
other GET was failing due to the path getting clipped from an undersized
I see at least 25 back-to-back pipelined transactions happen. I'm moving
forward to the next issue.
http2 client... Any thoughts on best scheme to add a http2 client?
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 2:22 AM Joel Winarske <joel.winarske at gmail.com>
> I need to do more characterizing before I come up with a minimal repo
> case. Later this week.
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Andy Green <andy at warmcat.com> wrote:
> On February 22, 2017 10:16:36 AM GMT+09:00, Joel Winarske <
> joel.winarske at gmail.com> wrote:
> >Well I'm calling it a delay, but I suspect it's just the expected
> >of the "service loop". Given http client is not a single synchronous
> >function call.
> It depends what kind of delay, but name resolution takes network
> roundtrips as does establishing the tcp connection. But those should be no
> different than say wget doing the same thing.
> >The scenario is loading the "site". Which is around 275 server
> >requests on
> >initial load. Of which only the second occurring Method: POST
> >is "refused"/or "pending". I never see the incoming request in the
> Hm if this is lws it sounds like keepalive pipelining probs.
> >Chrome doesn't always report the transaction "refused". Most of the
> Mmm I dunno that is related at all to the canonical "Connection Refused"
> at tcp level. It seems to feel an individual transaction was not processed.
> >it says "pending", which in Wireshark - the server doesn't respond. So
> >pattern is every other POST '/rest/send', of which calls the http
> If we ignore "Connection Refused", we know from your earlier log chrome is
> pipelining because it's logged when it handles the transaction complete.
> Personally I never tried two back-back POSTs pipelined, and this
> encompasses the behaviour of your POST callbacks as well as lws itself.
> Is there a way I can reproduce it without a big effort?
> >On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Andy Green <andy at warmcat.com> wrote:
> >> On February 22, 2017 7:46:12 AM GMT+09:00, Joel Winarske <
> >> joel.winarske at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >lwsws on Windows, so libuv.
> >> Right.
> >> >Timing wise the refused request happens during
> >> >lws_ssl_client_connect2().
> >> If we believe it really is a "connection refused" specifically, and
> >> something else that falls into the general category of "my connection
> >> not accepted", it's more interesting to understand the state of the
> >> part at that time. We are spamming it with connections? Something
> >> >Also how do I get rid of the delay between
> >> >and
> >> >lws_ssl_client_connect2()?
> >> ... what delay?
> >> -Andy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Libwebsockets